.png){kind=logo}
Bitcoin’s origins are back in focus after new claims linked the asset to US intelligence agencies. The discussion follows comments by Professor Jiang, who said agencies such as the CIA could have had the motive and technical ability to create Bitcoin.
He did not provide evidence, and several market analysts rejected the theory, pointing instead to Bitcoin’s documented roots in the cypherpunk movement.
Professor Jiang raised the claim during an interview on the Jack Neel Podcast, which premiered on April 15. He questioned the standard account that Bitcoin came from the pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto and was released freely to the public. Jiang said that did not fit his view of how such a system would normally emerge.
He also pointed to the name Satoshi Nakamoto and claimed it “translates into central intelligence,” a claim that remains disputed. Jiang said a game theory reading of Bitcoin’s creation could lead to state actors rather than an independent developer or small group.
In his words, “When you do game theory analysis, you look at all possibilities. You end up with a deep state. You end up with a CIA.”
Jiang said blockchain technology could serve intelligence agencies in two ways. He described the public ledger as a possible surveillance system that allows financial activity to be tracked in real time. He called it “almost like a Trojan horse” if used for that purpose.
He also argued that such a network could help fund covert operations outside normal financial channels. Jiang said agencies involved in “black ops” would need alternative ways to move money while staying outside direct political control. However, he did not present documents, records, or technical proof to support the claim that Bitcoin was designed for those uses.
The comments drew pushback from analysts, including Ansel Lindner and Lyn Alden. They said the theory reflects a weak reading of how Bitcoin works and ignores the way the network operates without central control. Their view is that Bitcoin’s open-source design, public code, and distributed validation do not support the idea of an intelligence-backed system running behind the scenes.
The broader historical record also points elsewhere. Bitcoin is widely tied to the cypherpunk movement, which promoted privacy tools, encryption, and peer-to-peer digital money long before the Bitcoin white paper appeared in 2008. For that reason, the CIA theory remains outside the mainstream view of Bitcoin’s creation.
At the same time, the lack of a confirmed identity for Satoshi Nakamoto continues to leave room for speculation. That gap has helped older theories return, even without evidence.
The theory is spreading again at a time when Bitcoin is drawing fresh attention from traders and institutions. At press time, Bitcoin price has held above the $71,000 to $72,000 support range and is consolidating below the $75,000 mark. Recent price action has kept the asset in focus as market participants watch for a move above near-term resistance.
Also Read: Proof of Work isn’t Just on the Bitcoin Blockchain: It’s in Your Wallet
