.png){kind=logo}
Elon Musk’s X Corp is currently in a legal battle with US startup Operation Bluebird over the ownership of the iconic Twitter trademark. The conflict raises questions about whether X has abandoned its trademark rights by rebranding from Twitter to X.
Operation Bluebird insists that the once-famous Twitter brand was forsaken, and it intends to reclaim it for a new platform. The lawsuit highlights a clash between legacy brand recognition and evolving corporate identity strategies, raising questions about how trademarks are maintained in the digital age.
In court documents, X asserts that the Twitter brand is "alive and well" and that millions continue to visit the site via the twitter.com domain, further supporting the brand’s commercial use. X claims that rebranding does not require giving up a trademark under US law, and continued use of the brand by users and companies is a sign of its ongoing recognition. The lawsuit demands both compensatory damages and a ruling restricting Bluebird's upcoming activities.
Under the Lanham Act, a trademark may be cancelled if it is unused for three consecutive years or if the owner discontinues use with no intent to resume. Operation Bluebird claims that X's post-rebranding actions satisfy both conditions, noting that the Twitter name and logo are no longer present. Intellectual property lawyers note that even inactive trademarks with some degree of public awareness may still have legal protection that can be enforced.
Michael Peroff and Stephen Coates, Bluebird’s leadership team, contend that X “legally abandoned the TWITTER mark,” making it available for lawful use by another entity. X Corp has remained silent to the public, except for its court filings; however, its lawsuit highlights the worldwide acceptance and marketing of the Twitter trademark, which continues despite the rebrand. Analysts view a substantial legal difficulty in the argument of whether renaming can nullify old trademark rights.
This Twitter trademark lawsuit highlights a growing trend in tech companies vigorously defending legacy intellectual property after significant rebrands. The trial might affect courts' views on abandonment when companies shift branding while retaining platforms and domains associated with old marks. Legal observers suggest that this outcome might open the door to similar disputes over iconic technology brands in the future.
Although the lawsuit is filed in a US federal court, its implications are worldwide due to Twitter's international presence before its rebranding to X. For users in India and other markets where Twitter still has broad adoption, clarity on trademark ownership may affect licensing and third-party integrations. This lawsuit illustrates how brands must navigate legacy value while evolving their identity strategies for digital platforms.
The X trademark litigation in 2023 involving Twitter is a direct consequence of Musk's statement signalling farewell to the Twitter name and symbol. Despite this, the company's actions to enforce its rights and the current Terms of Service are clear indications of its intent to retain. Legal analysts note that trademark battles often hinge on nuanced evidence of ongoing use, making this dispute a complex test case for intellectual property norms.
Also Read: Elon Musk Settles $10M Lawsuit with Donald Trump Over Twitter Ban
The X Corp trademark dispute highlights the tension between preserving the value of old brands and updating their corporate identities in the digital age. The way courts view abandonment may change the way tech companies protect iconic trademarks globally.
Although Operation Bluebird considers this situation an opportunity to reclaim a historic brand, the continued use of the domain and its widespread recognition reinforce its legal position. The case demonstrates the growing need for strategic brand management and legal vigilance in modern digital platforms.
