.png){kind=logo}
US tech executive and crypto czar David Sacks warns that the most considerable risk from artificial intelligence lies not in a robot revolt, but in mass surveillance and the distortion of truth. He voiced his concern during a Monday episode of Andreessen Horowitz’s podcast The Ben & Marc Show.
David argued that heavy regulation could steer AI tools to reflect government bias and suppress dissenting facts. He also described a future in which AI lies, distorts answers, and rewrites history to serve political agenda.
Sacks criticized the previous Joe Biden administration and states such as California and Colorado for adopting heavy-handed consumer-protection laws that target “algorithmic discrimination.” He claimed that such laws could compel foundational models to incorporate ideological biases. He said over-regulation “can mold AI tools to fit the ideological biases of the government.” He argued that once AI reflects those biases, it can distort both information and facts.
The crypto czar explained that AI knows vast amounts about the individual and will act as a personal assistant. This, he said, turns it into a “perfect tool for the government to monitor and control you.” In his view, this form of surveillance and control ranks among the most significant risks that AI poses.
Sacks pointed towards the release of Gemini by Google in February 2024 as an early sign. He said the model’s distorted outputs, such as incorrect historical depictions, “were not an accident” and reflect deeper issues in training and ideology. This model had generated inaccurate images of US founding fathers and Nazi soldiers, sparking debate over bias and accuracy.
The US entrepreneur offered a provocative reframing of what constitutes the key AI risk. He insisted that the threat “was not described by James Cameron” in his film-based visions. Instead, he said the danger aligns more with 1984 by George Orwell. He said, “It’s not the Terminator; it’s 1984,” referring to a scenario of pervasive surveillance and truth control.
In the podcast, Sacks also discussed the approach of the Donald Trump administration. He said the Trump team is “pro-regulation” on crypto and aims to set clear rules for the industry. By contrast, he noted that AI regulation under previous frameworks had emphasized harm prevention over innovation. Sacks said the idea for AI should be about “how do we unleash innovation,” whereas crypto should focus on “how do we create regulatory certainty.”
Sacks’ remarks reflect a larger debate in the tech industry over AI governance, content moderation, and algorithmic transparency. The October 2023 executive order on AI by the Biden administration aimed to prioritize safety; however, critics argue that it could enable regulatory capture and censorship under the guise of safety. On the other hand, AI safety advocates warn that without oversight, robust systems may be deployed recklessly by private actors.
The model-error episode with Google’s Gemini added fuel to this debate. The incident sparked discussions about over-correction during AI training and the risk of embedding ideological biases into foundational models. Sacks used this as evidence for his broader claim about misaligned AI tools and the risk of surveillance.
As industry leaders weigh innovation and regulation, the question remains: will AI evolve into a force for empowerment - or tools of control and distortion?
David Sacks cautions that the actual danger of AI lies in government surveillance and ideological control, not robot rebellion. He advocates for balanced AI regulation that protects innovation while preventing the misuse of technology for political or social manipulation.
Read More: Donald Trump Names David Sacks as White House AI and Crypto Czar
