.png){kind=logo}
A major win for AI and the tech industry as Claude-AI maker Anthropic wins the early round of a copyright legal lawsuit. The California federal court rejected the preliminary bid by Universal Music Group Tab and other publishers to restrict Anthropic from using their music properties to train their AI chatbot Claude. Judge Eumi Lee stated that the publishers failed to convince that Anthropic’s conduct caused “irreparable harm”. Further stated, “Publishers are essentially asking the Court to define the contours of a licensing market for AI training.”
Earlier in 2023, several music publishers, including UMG, Concord, ABKO filed a lawsuit alleging AI copyright infringement involving works of Beyonce, Rolling Stones, and 500 other popular artists. Earlier, tech giants like OpenAI, Microsoft, Meta claimed to use "fair use" of copyrighted material under U.S. law by studying it to create transformative content. Still, the battle between AI and publishers, authors, and artists remains consistent. The allegations of copyright infringement and misuse without consent or payment to train AI sparked a global debate on ethical grounds.
As the AI Copyright debate intensifies, this judgement gives AI a strong legal foothold in the battle against AI copyright infringement of artistic properties. Anthropic’s spokesperson expressed pleasure with the court’s decision on not agreeing with the publisher’s “disruptive and amorphous request”. However, the publishers are confident in their claims and demands and are unlikely to back down. The crucial question of the threshold between innovation and infringement, and whether it is even fair to give so much liberty to the AI giants, remains challenged. Till then, stay tuned for a bigger courtroom showdown.
