Podcast

Data Privacy Governance: Protiviti’s Sachin Tayal on Why CEO Leadership Matters Most

Why India’s DPDP Act Demands CEO-Level Accountability: Insights from Protiviti’s Sachin Tayal

Written By : IndustryTrends

India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act has shifted from policy discussion to operational mandate. With the rules now notified, enterprises have clarity on expectations and timelines. What was once viewed as a compliance requirement is now a leadership imperative.

As India’s digital economy expands rapidly, organizations face mounting scrutiny over how they collect, manage, and process personal data. In a recent episode of the Analytics Insight Podcast, host Priya Dialani spoke with Sachin Tayal, Managing Director at Protiviti’s India Member Firm, about why CEOs must embed accountability for data across the enterprise.

Why DPDP Is No Longer Just a Compliance Issue

Priya opened the discussion by asking why the Act can no longer be delegated solely to legal or IT teams. Sachin was clear in his response. He stated, “DPDP has changed the way, actually, not only every CEO but even every board needs to think about data privacy. So it is no longer a CIO, a compliance, or an HR issue. It is pretty much an organization-wide issue.”

He noted that many boards now dedicate formal agenda time to DPDP compliance. However, he stressed that this shift goes beyond regulatory adherence. “It is just not a compliance that they are thinking about,” he explained, outlining three critical reasons CEOs must personally engage.

Accountability Now Sits at the Top

The first reason lies in how the Act defines responsibility. “This aid clearly states that accountability lies with the data fiduciary. It clearly fixes the responsibility at the organization level, not just at an individual level,” Sachin said.

Corporate accountability ultimately rests with key managerial personnel, “the responsibility lies actually with the CEOs. They are the ones who are responsible to comply with that.” The DPDP Act, therefore, transforms data governance into a boardroom matter.

The Cost of Failure and the Cost to Trust

The Managing Director of Protiviti India Member Firm also highlighted the financial implications. “The penalty can go up to 250 crores,” he stated, underscoring the seriousness of non-compliance.

Yet for him, the greater risk is reputational. “It is just not about a compliance issue. It is about a trust issue,” he emphasized. Customers increasingly reward organizations that handle their data responsibly. Conversely, breaches can erode confidence overnight.

Referencing a widely known Western credit bureau, Sachin Tayal responds that delayed responses and weak governance led to market value erosion and executive fallout. “It all started with this data breach,” he said.

For Indian enterprises, particularly those serving Gen Z and Gen Alpha consumers, data protection must be embedded into strategy, culture, and governance. As the MD of the company concluded, CEOs must ensure that “what data means has to be on their agenda and they should include it in their meetings and in their board meetings.”

Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp

Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Price Prediction for 2027

Crypto News Today: Strategy Says $6 Billion Debt Safe Even if Bitcoin Crashes to $8,000

Best Crypto to Buy: Cardano (ADA) Won’t Reach $10, But This Cheap Crypto Might

XRP Eyes $15: Price May Surge After Breaking Major Resistance

Why Ethereum Leads as the Top Choice for Institutional Investors