.png){kind=logo}
Most culture initiatives fail for the same reason most ad campaigns fail: they try to be liked by everyone and end up meaning nothing to anyone. A mission statement written by committee reads like it was written by committee, and employees can tell the difference between language built to be approved and language built to be true. According to The Fascination Factor, the new book coming from André Martin and Mark Fitzloff, there are five things leaders can actually do to build a culture people don't want to leave. None of them cost money. All of them require nerve, because all of them mean giving up some control over how the company is perceived.
First, put the company's quirks on display instead of sanding them down. Every organization has a founding story that's a little embarrassing: a garage, a failed first product, an early client who almost said no. Communications teams tend to bury that history in favor of something more polished, which is exactly backward. It's the quirks no focus group could invent that make a brand, or a company, feel human instead of generic. Celebrate the garage. Celebrate the failed product. The rough edges are the only part of the story a competitor can't copy.
Second, be honest about how the place actually runs, including the parts that would sound strange to an outsider. Every workplace has its own brand of crazy: the unwritten rule that real decisions happen on a walk instead of in a conference room, that nothing serious gets discussed before the second cup of coffee, that the best ideas show up during a Tuesday night working session nobody put on the calendar. Don't sweep any of that under the rug. Spell it out on purpose, before someone joins rather than after they've already signed the offer and found out the hard way. Giving people an accurate preview doesn't scare off the right candidates. It scares off the wrong ones, which is a feature, not a bug, and it does filtering work no values statement ever will. A candidate who hears the real version and still says yes has already opted in more completely than any onboarding session could manage after the fact.
Third, treat long-tenured people like the asset they are. Most companies spotlight the newest hire and let the 20-year veteran fade quietly into the org chart, as if longevity were something to apologize for. Flip that. Let the person who started as an intern and now runs a department that didn't exist when they arrived tell their own story.
Fourth, be specific about who thrives there and who doesn't. Vague values language, "we value innovation and collaboration," attracts nobody in particular, because it could describe literally any company's careers page. A precise description of the kind of person who does well, including an honest description of the kind who doesn't, does self-selecting work no interview process can replicate. "The people who succeed here love fast pivots and aren't afraid to fail twice before winning" tells a very different person to apply than a generic list of adjectives ever could, and it tells the wrong person to look elsewhere before either side wastes six months finding out.
Fifth, and hardest for most leaders to actually do, say out loud what you love about the place, and mean it. This sounds soft. It isn't. A leader's enthusiasm, or the visible lack of it, sets the ceiling for everyone underneath them. Take the time to remember why you fell for the organization in the first place: the week you saw the work actually change something for someone. Say that out loud instead of keeping it to yourself. It gives everyone else permission to feel the same way without sounding naive for admitting it.
Fitzloff has run creative departments long enough to recognize the version of this that fails: a values statement stapled to the employee handbook, unread, unfelt, contradicted by how the place actually operates the moment someone new walks in. The five moves above work because they're specific enough to be tested against reality. A vague value can't be contradicted, because it doesn't actually claim anything. A specific one can, which is exactly what makes it credible the moment it holds up.
None of these five moves require a budget line or a task force. What they require is a leader willing to describe the company as it actually is, warts included, instead of the version that reads best in a recruiting deck. That's a harder discipline than it sounds like, and most organizations never attempt it, which is exactly why the ones that do stand out so clearly to the people deciding whether to stay.
This isn't a campaign so much as it's editing: cut what's generic, keep what's true, and let what's left do the work.
