Bitcoin can improve financial access, but price volatility makes daily use risky for low-income users.
High energy use from mining can raise power costs and hurt poor communities the most.
Digital wallets help small users, but real inclusion still needs stability and trust.
Financial inclusion means people can easily use financial services like payments, savings, and credit without high costs or complex rules. Many people around the world still lack bank accounts or face limits like strict ID requirements, frozen accounts, or high fees.
Bitcoin entered this space with a bold promise. Anyone with a phone and internet access can send or receive money without going through a bank or government entity. This idea sounds powerful, especially for people left out of the formal system. But the full story looks more complicated once energy use and real-world access are considered.
Bitcoin allows people to store and move value without banks. This matters in countries with weak banking systems or unstable currencies. A digital wallet can work where banks fail or refuse service. Small businesses and freelancers also use BTC for cross-border payments, as it avoids delays and middlemen. Some communities see the asset as a backup option when cash becomes unsafe or scarce.
New payment layers like the Lightning Network aim to improve daily use. Lightning supports fast and low-cost payments by moving many transactions away from the main BTC network.
Public Lightning capacity reached about 5,606 BTC, which shows growing interest in small payments. This growth suggests better tools for everyday use, even if adoption still remains uneven.
Also Read: VanEck Says Bitcoin Could Reach $2.9M by 2050 as Settlement Use Expands
Large-scale BTC adoption shows how hard inclusion really is. A 2025 IMF assessment found that Bitcoin use stayed low even where governments supported it. The report said the benefits of inclusion remained limited, and the costs stayed high.
In El Salvador, Bitcoin gained legal status, but most people still preferred cash and traditional apps. Trust issues, technical problems, and limited merchant use slowed adoption. Legal approval alone did not create inclusion.
Bitcoin mining uses proof-of-work, which requires massive computing power. Estimates put Bitcoin’s yearly electricity use at 204 terawatt-hours. Carbon emissions associated with this use amount to about 114 million tons of CO₂. These numbers place Bitcoin energy use near that of mid-sized countries. This scale forces attention from governments and power regulators.
In the United States, estimates suggest crypto mining uses between 0.6% and 2.3% of total electricity demand. This share looks small at first, but mining clusters often sit in specific areas. Local grids feel the stress, not the national average. When miners increase demand, electricity prices can rise, or blackouts can become more common. Poor households suffer first when power costs rise.
Low-income areas already struggle with unstable electricity. Extra demand from mining can make things worse. Some regions responded with bans or limits when power shortages appeared. When authorities shut down illegal mining, local electricity use dropped sharply. These events show how mining concentrates pressure on specific communities instead of spreading it evenly.
Illegal mining creates another serious issue. In Malaysia, authorities estimated losses of about $1.11 billion between 2020 and August 2025 due to electricity theft from illegal crypto mining. Power theft shifts costs onto honest users and weakens grid investment. People who already struggle to pay bills end up covering these losses. This outcome clearly works against financial and energy inclusion.
Also Read: XRP vs Bitcoin: Rare Ichimoku Breakout Signals Potential XRP Rally
Mining companies now use more renewable energy. A 2025 Cambridge study reported that sustainable energy sources made up about 52.4% of Bitcoin mining’s energy mix. Natural gas replaced coal as the largest source. This shift reduces pollution and health damage, especially in poor areas near coal plants.
Cleaner energy does not solve everything. Renewable power remains limited in many regions. When miners compete for clean electricity, prices can rise. Electrification projects for homes or schools may slow down. Proof-of-work also encourages more mining when Bitcoin prices rise, which increases total energy demand even if the energy mix improves.
Bitcoin does not operate alone in the inclusion space. According to the World Bank Global Findex 2025, formal account ownership and digital savings grew strongly in developing countries. Mobile money systems expanded even faster.
The industry reported about 1.75 billion registered mobile money accounts handling roughly $1.4 trillion in yearly transactions. These systems already support wages, small shops, and government payments on a large scale. They still have flaws, but people actually use them daily.
BTC can help with inclusion in specific cases. It offers censorship resistance, cross-border transfer, and an alternative store of value. Energy costs, Bitcoin price volatility, and usability issues reduce these benefits. When mining raises power prices or drains grids, poor communities pay the price. Inclusion fails if energy systems break under the load.
A realistic view separates choice from cost. Bitcoin expands financial choice for some people, but proof-of-work creates real energy burdens. Strict rules against power theft, better grid planning, and consumer protection can reduce harm. Without these steps, BTC risks helping a few while hurting many, which defeats the idea of true financial inclusion.
1. Does Bitcoin really help financial inclusion?
Bitcoin helps people without banks access digital money, but the benefits are limited for daily needs.
2. Why is Bitcoin’s energy use a problem?
Mining uses huge amounts of electricity, which can raise prices and stress local power grids.
3. Are digital wallets safe for everyone?
Digital wallets work well, but poor internet access and low tech skills create barriers.
4. Can small businesses rely on Bitcoin payments?
Some small businesses use it, but price swings make income unpredictable.
5. Is Bitcoin greener than before?
Mining uses more renewable energy now, but total energy demand still remains very high.