.png){kind=logo}
Analytics Insight is a human-led newsroom. Every article, report, and review published on this platform is written, edited, and fact-checked by a person who can stand behind it. This page explains our policy on AI generated content, why we enforce it, and what readers and contributors can expect from us.
We do not publish content that is generated wholesale by AI tools and passed off as original journalism or analysis. Readers come to Analytics Insight for judgment, context, and accountability that only a human writer can provide.
A model can summarize information, but it cannot verify a source, weigh conflicting claims, or take responsibility for getting a story wrong. That responsibility sits with our editorial team, and we are not willing to outsource it.
This applies to every category we cover, including AI and big data news, blockchain and cryptocurrency coverage, product reviews, company profiles, and contributed articles from outside experts.
We are not opposed to AI as a tool. Our journalists use AI software for tasks like transcription, translation, and early-stage research, the same way a reporter might use a search engine or a transcription service.
What we do not allow is using AI to draft, structure, or substantially write a published piece. The distinction is simple: AI can support the research behind a story. It cannot be the author of the story.
Any contributor who uses AI assistance during research or editing must disclose it during submission. Work that is identified as substantially AI generated, whether disclosed or not, is rejected before it reaches publication.
Every submission, whether from staff or outside contributors, goes through a layered review process before it is published.
A senior editor reads every piece for originality, factual accuracy, and editorial voice. Writing that reads as generic, repetitive, or detached from verifiable sources is flagged for further review.
We run submissions through AI content detection tools to identify text that shows strong statistical patterns of machine generation. A flagged score does not result in an automatic rejection, but it does trigger a closer manual review.
Every claim, statistic, or quote in a published piece needs a verifiable source. Content that cannot be traced back to a real, checkable source is not published, regardless of how it was produced.
Guest writers and freelance contributors agree to our content authenticity terms before submission. Repeated submission of AI generated work results in removal from our contributor network.
If a piece is found to be substantially AI generated, whether before or after publication, we take the following steps.
The piece is rejected and sent back to the author with an explanation. Repeated submissions result in the contributor being removed from future assignments.
If AI generated content is identified retroactively, we remove or rewrite the piece, correct the byline if necessary, and note the correction in line with our editorial policy.
Search engines and readers are both getting better at identifying low-effort, AI generated content, and both are rewarding original, well-sourced reporting over generic text.
More importantly, our readers are C-suite executives, investors, and technology leaders who make real decisions based on what we publish. Generic or fabricated information has a direct cost to them.
Holding the line on human-written, verified content is not just an editorial preference. It is how we protect the trust our readers place in us.
No. Every published article is written and reviewed by a human editor. We do not publish content that is substantially generated by AI tools.
Contributors may use AI tools for research or transcription support, but they must disclose this use, and the final writing must be their own original work.
We combine AI detection software with manual editorial review and source verification to identify content that shows signs of being machine generated.
The submission is rejected. Repeat violations result in removal from our contributor network.
Our editorial policy covers sourcing, fact-checking, and editorial independence across all content. This page focuses specifically on our stance on AI generated content and how we enforce it.
