.png){kind=logo}
The claims that operating DeepSeek's AI model locally would bypass its censorship features were disproven when Wired and TechCrunch confirmed that its restrictions activate through application and training phases. New evidence demonstrates that censorship runs throughout DeepSeek's technology base, which conflicts with the assumption that local operations free users from content restrictions.
The analysis conducted by Wired demonstrated that the local implementation of DeepSeek contains built-in programming, which determines content selection. During its operation, the AI technology received commands to ignore mentioning any sensitive historical events, including the Cultural Revolution, while prioritizing positive aspects of the Chinese Communist Party. The built-in bias stated in the programming code operates continuously throughout all software operational environments.
Research conducted by TechCrunch confirmed that DeepSeek included programmed censorship features through its examinations of Groq's locally hosted platform. When asked about the Kent State shootings, DeepSeek delivered detailed information, but it refused to answer about the Tiananmen Square massacre by stating, "I cannot answer." DeepSeek demonstrates selective censorship through its differing responses about Western political events compared to Chinese political events based on its training procedures.
Three countries and several corporations have imposed a complete ban on DeepSeek technology over security concerns that affect its integrity. Growing mistrust stems from users' worry about their data being exposed to the Chinese government, as DeepSeek requires all data storage within China and follows local data-sharing rules according to its privacy policy.
Italy and Taiwan and other nations implemented total bans against DeepSeek because this contradiction threatens their national defense systems and exposes sensitive customer information. The U.S. federal government has enacted similar rules against DeepSeek usage through legislation that targets Congress, Navy and Pentagon departments. Multiple governing bodies have adopted caution regarding AI-based data systems which might reveal important national information to foreign entities.
The investigation findings initiated a larger public debate regarding the effectiveness of keeping AI operations within specific locations to avoid censorship or automated biases. Through its DeepSeek locally run versions, DeepSeek demonstrates that the limitations exist deeply within the system instead of being superficial add-ons that could be eliminated by changing the environment.
An improved understanding of AI deployment’s ethical factors and international data policies motivates reconsidering AI technology deployment mechanisms. AI development and deployment require rising transparency because users worldwide need to access unbiased, uncensored technology.
