.png){kind=logo}
- Insights
- Cryptocurrencies
- Stocks
- White Papers
- Industry
- Geography
- Insights
- Cryptocurrencies
- Stocks
- White Papers
- Industry
- Geography
ChatGPT and other generative AI platforms in enterprises have grown significantly. After all, these artificial intelligence platforms can execute various job duties with the correct cues, from emailing and coding to project management and customer care support.
The technology is, however, very contentious, with a wide variety of detractors concerned about AI's possible effects on the commercial sector. The primary force behind the movement to outlaw generative AI is uncertainty about its accuracy, although there are many more arguments for doing so. In this article, we'll explain why AI platforms in 2023 are being prohibited in the first place and show you which companies have begun to forbid it for their employees.
Since ChatGPT went live in November, the IT sector has been buzzing, with numerous companies developing AI rivals to take on the fantastic platform. Even yet, several businesses continue to explicitly forbid or restrict their staff's use of generative AI, at least until they find a better-controlled method to utilize it.
Although Apple is frequently at the forefront of technological advancement, it is standing fast and forbidding its employees from using ChatGPT.
The main worry behind Apple's restriction is that higher management is worried about staff members accidentally divulging secret information, which may result in a leak.
It's interesting to note that Apple prohibited its employees from using AI on the day when ChatGPT for iOS was launched.
Samsung's move to implement a similar prohibition on generative AI platforms like ChatGPT may have catalyzed Apple's decision to follow suit because their justifications are remarkably similar. The difference, however, is that whereas Apple forbade workers from discussing sensitive material, a Samsung employee did so on ChatGPT, potentially exposing the company's source code.
Samsung took its employees into account when it banned ChatGPT. The South Korean-based business polled its staff to get their opinions on the matter and discovered that 65% of them are worried about security issues while utilizing ChatGPT and other generative AI platforms.
In February, Verizon's telecom corporation expressed its views on employees utilizing ChatGPT in a public letter to staff. As you may have predicted, it's not a pleasant one.
Although ChatGPT was described in the announcement as "not synonymous with AI," employees were prohibited from using it since Verizon acknowledged that "artificial intelligence is integral" to the company's long-term strategy.
Businesses often need to be more skeptical of workers using generative AI tools like ChatGPT to boost productivity, not just tech companies. In fact, before the bulk of the IT industry, the banking sector was one of the first to object to the technology, with some prominent banks openly forbidding AI for staff.
It's reasonable to question why the technology is being prohibited in the first place since so many well-known firms and actual nations have already outlawed generative AI platforms like ChatGPT.
To begin with, ChatGPT and its equivalents are still relatively young. These platforms, which only went live in November of last year, are far from flawless and convey a lot of severe AI mistakes that might have a distinctly lousy effect on a firm or a nation. According to recent research on the generative platform Google Bard, the technology is also particularly prone to the propagation of false information.
Additionally, there needs to be more connection between employees and employers using generative AI. According to reports, 68% of workers use generative AI platforms without informing their managers, and 47% of companies prefer AI over new hiring. It's safe to predict that AI will significantly influence the job.
Said generative AI isn't ready for prime time yet. The likelihood of mistakes, the use gap, and the propensity for disinformation are sufficient reasons for big companies to steer clear of technology.
