Wallets linked to the CYBERLEEK memecoin moved about $350,000 generated from liquidity provider fees after unauthorized GTA VI footage drew traders to the token, according to on-chain analyst Conor Grogan. He said the funds moved through several over-the-counter providers. The wallets’ controller remains unidentified.
Grogan said the proceeds came from liquidity fees rather than a large direct token sale by the operator. CYBERLEEK launched on Solana on August 15, according to publicly reported blockchain data.
The token gained attention as an account using the CyberLeek name released previously unseen GTA VI footage. Each new release attracted attention, while trading activity generated fees for the wallet supplying liquidity.
A liquidity provider supplies token pairs to a decentralized exchange pool and receives a share of trading fees. This structure can produce revenue while the underlying liquidity remains in the pool.
Can leaked game footage generate token revenue without a creator selling the token? Grogan said this case showed an operator collecting fees as traders exchanged CYBERLEEK without dumping a large token allocation.
Grogan attributed the wallets to the person or group behind the GTA VI leaks. Still, no court filing, police statement, or Rockstar announcement has publicly identified the controller. On-chain records can show transfers, liquidity positions, and fee withdrawals. They cannot independently prove who controlled the wallets or who obtained Rockstar’s copyrighted files.
Grogan said the $350,000 moved through several OTC providers and described the activity as a cash-out. He did not publish evidence showing that all of the funds reached fiat currency.
Using an OTC provider does not itself prove money laundering. No regulator or court has ruled that the funds were criminal proceeds or that any provider knowingly processed illegal transactions.
Read More: GTA 6 Leaks Get Worse as CyberLeek Teases Nudist Town Clip
Take-Two Interactive filed Digital Millennium Copyright Act subpoena requests in the Southern District of New York on August 20. One proceeding sought information from Microsoft over GitHub accounts tied to copyrighted GTA VI material.
Related requests targeting Microsoft and Discord sought account identifiers, registration details, IP addresses, phone numbers, and some device data. The orders directed the companies to produce the requested records by Sept. 4.
Microsoft said it was working with Take-Two and Rockstar to protect their intellectual property. Discord said on August 25 that it had not yet received the subpoena and would review its validity and scope. Rockstar addressed the leaks on August 26 and called the unauthorized release ‘heartbreaking’ for developers. The company continued with its planned extended GTA VI presentation on August 27.
The leaked clips showed driving, combat, and interactions involving GTA VI character Jason. Take-Two has not publicly explained how the files were obtained, and Rockstar has not announced a development schedule change.
CYBERLEAK-linked wallets generated about $350,000 from liquidity fees as GTA VI leaks drove token trading, according to Grogan. Take-Two is separately pursuing account records from Microsoft and Discord. The available evidence traces funds and accounts, but it does not establish the controller’s identity.